Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mary Giannini's avatar

I wish it didn’t matter so much.

Expand full comment
Arthur S Leonard's avatar

The US News rankings weight "reputation" as 40% of the rankings. "Reputation" is based on questionnaires mailed to law school deans and hiring committee chairs, and a sampling of law firms and judges. Anybody who receives the form can say anything they want about any school on the list. Only a tiny percentage of those who receive these questionnaires fill them out. Nobody in the world knows enough about the 200-odd law schools on the list. People tend to rate their alma mater highly, and lots of law deans and profs and judges and biglaw partners went to a handful of so-called "elite" schools. In other words, 40% of the ranking score is based on hearsay, personal school loyalty, etc. In the age of internet access to legal materials, the size of a school's physical library plant shouldn't have anything to do with rankings. I consider the rankings to be spurious, a ploy by US News to make money. This is not sour grapes because I am on the faculty of a low-ranked school, or because Harvard (my alma mater) slipped a step. It is because I believe these rankings are spurious.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts