And yes, your solicitousness of "students who are doxxed" versus "Nazis" appears to me entirely based on your subjective view of the moral value of the speech being given. If an 18 year old marches through Skokie with the Nazi Party or that same 18 year old marches past St. Patrick's Cathedral with ACT-UP or that same 18 year old marches…
And yes, your solicitousness of "students who are doxxed" versus "Nazis" appears to me entirely based on your subjective view of the moral value of the speech being given. If an 18 year old marches through Skokie with the Nazi Party or that same 18 year old marches past St. Patrick's Cathedral with ACT-UP or that same 18 year old marches in support of the Intifada or that same 18 year old marches in support of abortion rights, the Constitutional analysis is the same. They are within their right to do so (unless threatening imminent lawless action) and the public is within their rights to name & shame them.
And yes, your solicitousness of "students who are doxxed" versus "Nazis" appears to me entirely based on your subjective view of the moral value of the speech being given. If an 18 year old marches through Skokie with the Nazi Party or that same 18 year old marches past St. Patrick's Cathedral with ACT-UP or that same 18 year old marches in support of the Intifada or that same 18 year old marches in support of abortion rights, the Constitutional analysis is the same. They are within their right to do so (unless threatening imminent lawless action) and the public is within their rights to name & shame them.