The provision wasn't about "guns." It is structured to ensure the individual's liberty and to hold the slippery slope of potential federal tyranny at bay. No one just wakes up in the gulag.
The right to bear arms is the right that ensures the rest of the constitution remains in force and applicable. The right of the people to keep a…
The provision wasn't about "guns." It is structured to ensure the individual's liberty and to hold the slippery slope of potential federal tyranny at bay. No one just wakes up in the gulag.
The right to bear arms is the right that ensures the rest of the constitution remains in force and applicable. The right of the people to keep and bear arms in order to form a militia if needed. If the people cannot individually bear arms then how would a militia be formed? This would be trading one form of potential tyranny for another.
The provision wasn't about "guns." It is structured to ensure the individual's liberty and to hold the slippery slope of potential federal tyranny at bay. No one just wakes up in the gulag.
The right to bear arms is the right that ensures the rest of the constitution remains in force and applicable. The right of the people to keep and bear arms in order to form a militia if needed. If the people cannot individually bear arms then how would a militia be formed? This would be trading one form of potential tyranny for another.
Watch 2000Mules the movie.
jfc, you had me until 2000 Mules
Never saw the movie, but have you? If you haven't then I don't understand how you can have an opinion.
Because others have and have reported how it’s factually inaccurate?