I just subscribed. Not because of the estimable Lisa Blatt but because I just learned you were the Underneath their Robes guy. I used to laugh out loud in the office.
Thank you! And yup, that was me; I’ve had multiple incarnations in legal blogging. (I like to tell potential subscribers to amortize the $50 over the 18 years I’ve been writing online—the first 16 of them for free, first at Underneath Their Robes and then Above the Law.)
Well done, David. I especially appreciated her noting a recent case where the Justices considered the issues in non-ideological ways. That is much needed these days and her calling it out is meaningful. Much to be learned from this interview.
Great interview - loving your podcast! I’m very curious about what Lisa Blatt was thinking during the whole Kavanaugh confirmation saga. She vocally backed him (was that a strategic move?) but then seemed to have gone completely silent after the accusations came out and before the Senate actually voted.
I just subscribed. Not because of the estimable Lisa Blatt but because I just learned you were the Underneath their Robes guy. I used to laugh out loud in the office.
Thank you! And yup, that was me; I’ve had multiple incarnations in legal blogging. (I like to tell potential subscribers to amortize the $50 over the 18 years I’ve been writing online—the first 16 of them for free, first at Underneath Their Robes and then Above the Law.)
Well done, David. I especially appreciated her noting a recent case where the Justices considered the issues in non-ideological ways. That is much needed these days and her calling it out is meaningful. Much to be learned from this interview.
Great interview - loving your podcast! I’m very curious about what Lisa Blatt was thinking during the whole Kavanaugh confirmation saga. She vocally backed him (was that a strategic move?) but then seemed to have gone completely silent after the accusations came out and before the Senate actually voted.