I haven’t researched the issue, but theories I’ve seen floated include (1) theft of government property, 18 USC 641, and (2) interference with a judicial officer of the United States, 18 USC 1503.
Ironically enough, though, this Court has generally made it harder to stretch criminal statutes to capture conduct that’s not clearly covered.
I haven’t researched the issue, but theories I’ve seen floated include (1) theft of government property, 18 USC 641, and (2) interference with a judicial officer of the United States, 18 USC 1503.
Ironically enough, though, this Court has generally made it harder to stretch criminal statutes to capture conduct that’s not clearly covered.
I haven’t researched the issue, but theories I’ve seen floated include (1) theft of government property, 18 USC 641, and (2) interference with a judicial officer of the United States, 18 USC 1503.
Ironically enough, though, this Court has generally made it harder to stretch criminal statutes to capture conduct that’s not clearly covered.
I have read some good legal analysis on 641 but haven't seen anything on 18 USC 1503.